About Rapid Detection

Customer Values

Pharmaceutical

Beauty & Home

Dairy

Beverage

Technical Information >

Case Studies

Regulatory

Distributors

News & Events

Contact Us

Home > Rapid Detection > Technical Information > Bioluminescence Technology

Bioluminescence Technology | Back to Technical Main Page>

Rapid Detection of Micro-Organisms using ATP Bioluminescence
Manufacturers across many industries are required or recommended to test each batch of product for microbial contamination. While agar plate testing has long been a useful and reliable method of testing for such microbial contamination, it does have drawbacks. In particular, it can take up to five days to grow a culture on an agar plate until a colony is formed which is large enough for the eye to detect.

Testing cycles that last many days have a significant impact on production timetables and efficiencies. The implications of these delays have led to a search for improved microbiological testing methods that are simpler and faster; todays rapid methods.

The rapid testing technologies currently available or being developed are numerous and diverse ranging from 'simple' analysis using biochemistry and testing methods requiring sophisticated analytical instruments to electrochemistry and immunoassay. The first group includes several rapid testing methods which use light in one form or another to measure the presence of micro-organisms, such as dye reduction, photometry, flow cytometry and bioluminescence.

Over the past ten years or so, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on the use of bioluminescence technology in the detection of micro-organisms. The generation of light by a biological process (hence bioluminescence) is most beautifully demonstrated by the American firefly Photinus pyralis. The mechanism by which fireflies produce a flash of light was first analyzed and identified by William McElroy in 1947. McElroy found that central to the light emission process was a specific enzyme reaction catalyzing the consumption of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In microbes, ATP can only be detected when living cells are present. It has since been established that the amount of light emitted from this reaction is directly proportional to the amount of ATP present.

Since all life forms contain ATP, applications in microbiology are based on capturing the micro-organisms, releasing the ATP from within the cell, and measuring the amount of bioluminescence generated. A high reading of relative light units (RLUs) indicates that a sample contains a high number of micro-organisms, provided the background ATP level is low. Unlike traditional testing methods, results from a bioluminescent reaction can be obtained quickly. Light is produced within seconds and can be measured with a luminometer.

In summary, the mechanism of reaction is described below:

Light generated by the reaction is measured in a luminometer of which there are several types (Stanley, 1992). The differences between the machines generally derive from the type of light detector used, e.g. photomultiplier tube, photodiode, or avalanche photodiode (Brown, 1989) and the degree of automation (single or multiple assays). The types of ATP detecting bioluminescence reagents are also varied, in kinetics and performance as well as quality. Reagent performance and sensitivity has improved greatly over the last 5 years (Schram 1991, Simpson et. al, 1990) and it is now possible to detect attomolar concentrations of ATP derived from micro-organisms. Theoretically, the ATP detected is equivalent to less than 10 organisms with the assay itself taking seconds to give a result.


Applications

ATP bioluminescence is widely used in industries such as the pharmaceutical and personal care product industries as well as dairy and food production plants for a variety of applications including raw material, in-process and finished product testing. Many food manufacturers also use ATP bioluminescence based assays for hygiene monitoring. The application of ATP detection using bioluminescence to monitor personal care products, toiletries and cosmetics was evident in research laboratories during the 1980s. Towards the end of that decade, research based procedures reported the detection of 1 cfu/g after a 24 hour enrichment phase (Nielsen and Van Dellen, 1989). At very low bioburden levels, the procedure requires an enrichment stage to allow for the amplication of microbial ATP that can be distinguished from the background.

Since then, procedures have been optimized and the technique adopted by major manufacturers as a rapid test for the detection of contaminated product. In addition to screening for low level contamination using an enrichment step, ATP bioluminescence can also be applied as a direct test, without enrichment, as a disaster check where high levels of contamination are suspected. Similarly, trend analysis may be performed by monitoring for changes or spikes in typically low level RLU readings.

The procedure is simple to implement provided the correct screening and validation procedures are followed. A brief summary of the most relevant parameters which may affect bioluminescence testing is given below together with data illustrating recent technical advances which have helped to improve the reliability and general applicability of the technique.



The General Procedure

The procedure for the detection of low level contamination using an enrichment step requires three simple steps:

  1. Disperse sample in broth (1% - 10% w/v)
  2. Incubate at 32 degrees C (18 to 28 hours depending upon kit and screening criteria)
  3. Assay aliquot (50 - 100 microliters) by bioluminescence

A number of considerations must be taken into account when validating the system including:

Sample effects
  - Light or enzyme inhibition
  - Background ATP

Growth Media
  - ATP Level
  - Influence on extraction
  - Preservative neutralization

Extractant
  - Efficiency of ATP extraction

Sensitivity of reagent
  - Level of ATP easily detected
  - Precision of test



Sample Effects
Not surprisingly, the effect of the sample itself on the bioluminescence assay is sometimes unpredictable. Occasionally, products will contain detergents and salts that will impact the bioluminescence reaction (Simpson and Hammond, 1991). Some sample ingredients may be derived from natural sources and can contain high levels of non-microbial ATP. High background ATP levels can give false positive results. Typically, however, these ingredients are present in the finished product at levels that do not interfere with the testing. A quick sample effects test is recommended to qualify the sample before performing a full validation. Of hundreds of products examined, rarely has there been a product that cannot be tested for microbial contamination in some way using ATP Bioluminescence.



Growth Media
The broth used to incubate the sample must be capable of supporting growth of viable organisms, be able to neutralize any preservative systems, contain relatively low levels of ATP and have good batch to batch consistency.

Letheen broth is an example of a general growth medium that meets these criteria. Table One below illustrates ATP content of a variety of broths including Letheen.

Type of Broth ATP content (pM)
Letheen Broth
Nutrient Broth
Tryptic Soy Broth
Sabouraud Liquid Medium
MTGE Broth
Sabouraud 2% Dextrose Broth
Fluid Thioglycollate
Antibiotic Broth
Eugon LT100
26
453
2774
420
469
239
5055
1392
700

Table 1; Results of testing for ATP content of a range of growth media

Consistency in ATP content from batch to batch is also important in the selection of an appropriate broth for enrichment. Table 2 shows the results of an assessment of ten batches of Letheen broth for ATP content.

Batch of Letheen Broth ATP content (pM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Mean ATP concentration

18
38
63
26
42
47
42
59
19
32

38.6 pM
Standard deviation 7.3pM

Table 2; Results showing ATP concentration in 10 batches of Letheen broth

This is demonstrated for SLM (Figure 1) at two concentrations of the enzyme. ATP depletion at higher apyrase activity (0.25 U/ml) was very rapid, while the lower enzyme activity (0.05 U/ml) gave a more gradual rate of depletion. Significantly, apparent ATP concentration leveled off at a similar amount for both activities of apyrase, demonstrating the presence of a luminogenic substrate other than ATP. This residual bioluminescence is typically even higher with other types of growth media. Fractionation of Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) using HPLC demonstrates the presence of at least three luminogenic substances other than ATP. The fractions were separately treated with 0.24 U.ml-1 apyrase (Table 2). Fractions 18, 42 (expected fraction for ATP) and 51 all decreased in bioluminescence with time, whereas fraction 34 remained bioluminescent after 26 hours of treatment. Treatment with an ATPase enzyme or a kinase removes only part of the signal. The phenomenon demonstrates that the problem in reducing the bioluminescence blank signals stems from luminogenic substrates for firefly luciferase, which either are not substrates for apyrase or are physically protected from degradation.

Using a proprietary technique, the level of media derived ATP post apyrase treatment can be further reduced by a factor of 10 to 100 fold depending on the starting material (Table 3). The most significant advantage of such an ATP depleted medium is that the number of organisms required to give a light signal at a significant level above background is reduced. With any ATP reduction procedure care must also be taken to validate the nutritional property of the treated media. In the above experiment growth properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Candida albicans and Penicillium expansum were checked and found to be unaffected by the treatment.


Extractant
The detection of micro-organisms using luciferin-luciferase reagents requires an extractant to lyse the cells and release ATP into solution. There are stringent and partially conflicting criteria for the extractant:

It must be sufficiently aggressive to attack a broad range of microbes with very different morphologies

  • It must not affect the activity of the luciferase enzyme
  • It should exhibit some chaotropic action in order to inactivate intracellular enzymes which would use the free ATP to begin repairing the bacterial structure (Lundin, 1989: Stanley, 1986)
  • The efficiency of an extractant is normally derived by comparing the amount of ATP released from a given number of organisms with the amount of ATP released using a reference method employing 2%-10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) as the lytic agent (Lundin, 1992).

Table 4 lists the organism types which were used in a study to determine the efficiency of a broad spectrum extractant developed in this laboratory. The mean extraction efficiency for the study was calculated to be 98% (SD = 30%) with a mean ATP level of 1.4 x 10 -18 moles per bacterial cell.

This extractant also has the advantage that it is not as chaotropic as TCA and does not affect ATP after extraction. It is, however, powerful enough to fully extract very quickly. Figure 2 shows extraction of ATP from an E.coli sample over 10 seconds.

Reagent Sensitivity
Simpson et al, (1990) demonstrated the high sensitivity of bioluminescence reagents. Although important, sensitivity is not the only performance criterion to consider. Consistency of light signal and reagent stability are also of great practical interest. This is, of course, the responsibility of reagent manufacturers and, apart from understanding the basic requirements when performing bioluminescence reactions and exercising good microbiology laboratory practice, there is little the user can do to ensure that reagent performance is adequate. End-users must insist manufacturers have carried out correct Q.C. procedures (e.g. as part of the Quality Assurance program) and have validated production procedures so that reagent consistency is maintained.



Summary
Many rapid microbiological methods are unsuitable when applied to cosmetics, toiletries and other personal care products because of interference from product constituents, inadequate sensitivity, difficulties in detecting certain types of micro-organism, complexity of procedures and/or instrumentation and cost. Bioluminescence can overcome many of these considerations to give a true advantage over other techniques.

The database of bioluminescence information increases daily at Celsis, and this technique is being adopted in an ever increasing range of research interests and industrial laboratories. ATP bioluminescence is beginning to show real financial benefits by reducing inventory costs and consumable spending. More than ever, the manufacturing industry has to consider not only the necessity of reducing costs but also the absolute requirement to produce goods of the desired quality under the watchful eye of the regulators and consumers alike. One example of the dilemma facing manufacturers is the drive toward excluding many synthetic preservatives from final product formulation with the possible penalty of reducing shelf life. The logistics required to produce goods fit for use puts even more pressure on the often rate limiting step of testing using conventional microbiology. This situation provides an example where the 24hr ATP bioluminescence test is being evaluated and will prove to be of considerable benefit.

In this laboratory, ATP bioluminescence remains a technology that is used for many applications requiring rapid tests. Future rapid methods are now being developed which combine the unique sensitivity and speed of bioluminescence with other emerging techniques especially in the areas of molecular biology, immunology and enzymology. Rapid micro-organism identification tests, toxin test and various residue tests will emerge which will aid the long awaited, but hopefully welcome, change to traditional microbiology.



References

  • Brown R G W, (1989). ATP Photon Counting using Avalanche Photodiodes. In Rapid Methods in Microbiology. Eds. Stanley P E, McCarthy B J and Smither R. Oxford Blackwells Scientific Publications.
  • Lundin A, (1989). ATP assays in routine microbiology: from visions to realities in the 1980s. In: ATP Luminescence. In Rapid Methods in Microbiology. Eds. Stanley P E, McCarthy B J and Smither R. Oxford Blackwells Scientific Publications.
  • Lundin A, (1992). Method for extraction of intracellular components. International Patent: PCT/GB92/00056.
  • McElroy W D, (1947). The energy source for bioluminescence in an isolated system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 33: 342-345.
  • Schram E, (1991). Evolution of Bioluminescent ATP assays. In: Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence: Current Status. Eds. Stanley P E, Krika L J.
  • Simpson W J, Hammond J R M (1991) The effect of detergents on firefly luciferase reactions. J. Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence, 6: 97-106.
  • Stanley P E (1986) Extraction of Adenosine Triphosphate from Microbial and Somatic Cells: In: Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence part B: Methods in Enzymology. Eds. Colowick S P and Kaplan N 0 London. Academic Press.
  • Stanley P E, (1992) A Survey of more than 90 Commercially Available Luminometers and Imaging Devices for Low-Light Measurements of Chemiluminescence and Bioluminescence, Including instruments for Manual, Automatic and Specialized Operation, for HPLC, LC, GLC and Microtitre Plates. Part 1: Descriptions. J. Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence, 7: 77-108.

 



 ATP bioluminescence

 technology has been around

 for forty years, but only since

 the introduction of Celsis'

 selective extraction reagents

 has the potential for this

 technology been allowed for

 use in a broad range of

 manufacturing industries.

 
Copyright©2006 Celsis International plc, All Rights Reserved   Privacy Policy